<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNA PrimeTime Morning, &#8216;Zoom In&#8217; Reviews on Twilight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twilightsingapore.com/2008/12/12/cna-primetime-morning-zoom-in-reviews-on-twilight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twilightsingapore.com/2008/12/12/cna-primetime-morning-zoom-in-reviews-on-twilight/</link>
	<description>Our very own blog for Twilighters in Singapore!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:23:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: erm</title>
		<link>http://twilightsingapore.com/2008/12/12/cna-primetime-morning-zoom-in-reviews-on-twilight/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator>erm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilightsingapore.com/?p=2518#comment-1876</guid>
		<description>im a devoted twilight fan, trust me, i can tell you which convos appear in whichever book in whichever scene.

still, i think melanie is right. because im more disappointed after watching the movie. the movie is SO NOT TWILIGHT. i mean, they changed so many freaking scenes. and the cast is... weird and doesnt fit. for some reason robert doesnt portray edward well. in my twocentsworth of opinion, he lacks the x-factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im a devoted twilight fan, trust me, i can tell you which convos appear in whichever book in whichever scene.</p>
<p>still, i think melanie is right. because im more disappointed after watching the movie. the movie is SO NOT TWILIGHT. i mean, they changed so many freaking scenes. and the cast is&#8230; weird and doesnt fit. for some reason robert doesnt portray edward well. in my twocentsworth of opinion, he lacks the x-factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wanderer</title>
		<link>http://twilightsingapore.com/2008/12/12/cna-primetime-morning-zoom-in-reviews-on-twilight/#comment-1763</link>
		<dc:creator>wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilightsingapore.com/?p=2518#comment-1763</guid>
		<description>Anyway, guys! She was just giving her own two cents on the movie! The way you guys bash her over what she represents is completely unethical! I mean, there are always 2 sides to an argument right? Like there are people who think that abortion is legit, while the other side thinks otherwise. Likewise, I am sure while there are hardcore Twilight fans who enjoy Bella/Edward&#039;s little romance, we should also allow room for others who don&#039;t exactly want to kiss the soles of Edward Cullen&#039;s feet. 

Yes, you may disagree wtih the review, but we should not bash Melanie for who she is just because she gave a movie you like a bad review. She was just doing her job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway, guys! She was just giving her own two cents on the movie! The way you guys bash her over what she represents is completely unethical! I mean, there are always 2 sides to an argument right? Like there are people who think that abortion is legit, while the other side thinks otherwise. Likewise, I am sure while there are hardcore Twilight fans who enjoy Bella/Edward&#8217;s little romance, we should also allow room for others who don&#8217;t exactly want to kiss the soles of Edward Cullen&#8217;s feet. </p>
<p>Yes, you may disagree wtih the review, but we should not bash Melanie for who she is just because she gave a movie you like a bad review. She was just doing her job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wanderer</title>
		<link>http://twilightsingapore.com/2008/12/12/cna-primetime-morning-zoom-in-reviews-on-twilight/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilightsingapore.com/?p=2518#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>Anyway she&#039;s right. Twilight makes Dracula look like a masterpiece, in terms of movies in the &#039;vampire&#039; genre. That we all have to admit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway she&#8217;s right. Twilight makes Dracula look like a masterpiece, in terms of movies in the &#8216;vampire&#8217; genre. That we all have to admit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wanderer</title>
		<link>http://twilightsingapore.com/2008/12/12/cna-primetime-morning-zoom-in-reviews-on-twilight/#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilightsingapore.com/?p=2518#comment-1750</guid>
		<description>I, for one, thought the casting was rather bad. Jacob looked like a homeless hobo; definitely not the bad boy, kinda handsome type everyone anticipated. I&#039;d rather the guy who played James replace Jacob. -_-

I was bored to tears myself watching Edward and Bella stareeeee into each others eyes. They barely smile at each other! Bella is expressionless in almost every scene. You cannot deny that there was absolutely no chemistry between the two.

For those who&#039;ve read the book, you would have agreed (or not) that one of the better chapters would have been of Bella and Edward&#039;s frolicking about in the meadow. I&#039;m sorry but imo the scene was completely ruined. Lines like &#039;You&#039;re my brand of heroin&#039; and &#039;And so the lion fell in love with the lamb..&#039; sounded somewhat forced and reluctant when it came from Pattison. The lion/lamb line for example, should have been delivered in a more teasing way. 

Plus, soundtrack = completely inappropriate. The songs were just.. inappropriate. The only thing that comes close was the love song towards the end when Bella and Edward dance about at prom. The rest were just irrelevant, and at times, irritating. There was no link between the songs played (be it genre wise, or the rhythm of the song) and the scenes showed. Disappointingly, Paramore&#039;s &#039;Decode&#039; was not played in the movie at all.

Anyway, for all these little hardcore Twilight fans, Pattison himself has criticised the film. 

&quot;When I read it I was convinced Stephenie was convinced she was Bella and it was like it was a book that wasn&#039;t supposed to be published. It was like reading her sexual fantasy, especially when she said it was based on a dream and it was like, &#039;Oh I’ve had this dream about this really sexy guy,&#039; and she just writes this book about it. Like some things about Edward are so specific, I was just convinced, like, &#039;This woman is mad. She’s completely mad and she’s in love with her own fictional creation.&#039; And sometimes you would feel uncomfortable reading this thing.&quot; ~ Robert Pattison.

http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/?p=6077#more-6077

Pleaes stop flaming down the poor woman already. If the lead actor himself thinks the movie sucks, what gives? Gee.

Anyway, just because the book is good doesn&#039;t mean the movie has to be good itself.. Time to face a fact here, Twilight fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, thought the casting was rather bad. Jacob looked like a homeless hobo; definitely not the bad boy, kinda handsome type everyone anticipated. I&#8217;d rather the guy who played James replace Jacob. -_-</p>
<p>I was bored to tears myself watching Edward and Bella stareeeee into each others eyes. They barely smile at each other! Bella is expressionless in almost every scene. You cannot deny that there was absolutely no chemistry between the two.</p>
<p>For those who&#8217;ve read the book, you would have agreed (or not) that one of the better chapters would have been of Bella and Edward&#8217;s frolicking about in the meadow. I&#8217;m sorry but imo the scene was completely ruined. Lines like &#8216;You&#8217;re my brand of heroin&#8217; and &#8216;And so the lion fell in love with the lamb..&#8217; sounded somewhat forced and reluctant when it came from Pattison. The lion/lamb line for example, should have been delivered in a more teasing way. </p>
<p>Plus, soundtrack = completely inappropriate. The songs were just.. inappropriate. The only thing that comes close was the love song towards the end when Bella and Edward dance about at prom. The rest were just irrelevant, and at times, irritating. There was no link between the songs played (be it genre wise, or the rhythm of the song) and the scenes showed. Disappointingly, Paramore&#8217;s &#8216;Decode&#8217; was not played in the movie at all.</p>
<p>Anyway, for all these little hardcore Twilight fans, Pattison himself has criticised the film. </p>
<p>&#8220;When I read it I was convinced Stephenie was convinced she was Bella and it was like it was a book that wasn&#8217;t supposed to be published. It was like reading her sexual fantasy, especially when she said it was based on a dream and it was like, &#8216;Oh I’ve had this dream about this really sexy guy,&#8217; and she just writes this book about it. Like some things about Edward are so specific, I was just convinced, like, &#8216;This woman is mad. She’s completely mad and she’s in love with her own fictional creation.&#8217; And sometimes you would feel uncomfortable reading this thing.&#8221; ~ Robert Pattison.</p>
<p><a href="http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/?p=6077#more-6077" rel="nofollow">http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/?p=6077#more-6077</a></p>
<p>Pleaes stop flaming down the poor woman already. If the lead actor himself thinks the movie sucks, what gives? Gee.</p>
<p>Anyway, just because the book is good doesn&#8217;t mean the movie has to be good itself.. Time to face a fact here, Twilight fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo-Twilight fan through and through</title>
		<link>http://twilightsingapore.com/2008/12/12/cna-primetime-morning-zoom-in-reviews-on-twilight/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo-Twilight fan through and through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilightsingapore.com/?p=2518#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>Jeez.. So what if the movie doesn&#039;t meet its mark. It&#039;s Twilight, and that&#039;s what counts. Or would you prefer a Twilight with night-vision goggles? Everyone who has made that particular statement is sooo typically human; all we do is criticize. Do we give the cast what their worth? No, we don&#039;t. Do we give them the respect they deserve for all the effort put into it? No we don&#039;t. Do we watch the movie and say: &quot;Gee, that stunt must be pretty hard on them&quot; or &quot;Look at how Kristen nails that &#039;tortured expression&#039; perfectly, it must have been hell of an effort from her&quot;? No we don&#039;t. No matter how &#039;vampire-y&#039; we want them to be, no matter how &#039;werewolf-y&#039; or &#039;Bella-y&#039; we expect them to be, they&#039;re still humans to the bones, you can&#039;t have something literally out of the storybook. So cut the whole cast some slack, scriptwriter, editor and all, and give them the credit they deserve. 

Oh, and this goes out to Chii, you&#039;ve asked for someone oh so well-versed with the series to enlighten you, I&#039;ve read it 88 times, and I think I have it in me to shed some light on the topic. I assume from your long, dedicated post to the &#039;horrors&#039; of dearly, beloved Twilight, that you for one, are a pessimist, and you thoroughly do NOT believe in true love. Point one, it&#039;s a fantasy, here, we&#039;re allowed to dream, we&#039;re allowed to imagine soulmates exist for our favourite Bella and the rest of us. Sure, a pessimist like you would think it&#039;s a whole load of crap, but keep that to yourself and don&#039;t ruin it for the rest of us. Who knows? One day, when you&#039;ve found that &#039;perfect someone&#039;, you&#039;d think back to this very day and say:&quot;What was I thinking?&quot; Agreed? 

Seriously, it&#039;d be no surprise if you turn out to be my friend, Nats. She has uncannily the exact ideals as you do. Quote:&#039;I don&#039;t see why Stephenie Meyer has to describe Bella eating her cereal one by one.&#039; And to that, I told her, &#039;Put a sock in it.&#039; Oh, and I suppose you WOULDN&#039;T like it if someone listens to you? Puh-leez. I listen to my friends rant all the day, they call me and we&#039;re on the phone for hours, with me offering opinion when needed and basically there to lend a ear, what&#039;s wrong with that? Or are you telling me I&#039;M a fictional character? If I&#039;m out of a book, how is it that I&#039;m typing this reply this very second? You tell me. 

I&#039;ve read my fill of historical romance, aand believe me, Edward is every bit a olden era hero, unlike the chauvanists we have here in the real world and in certain other books, of which I feel too tempted to rip, Edward lets Bella have her way at times, he treats her with utmost respect, he does NOT expect her to wait on him hand and foot. So it&#039;s YOUR turn to enlighten me, how is it, with all these traits is Edward a chauvanist? I&#039;m waiting to see the light. Back to what I&#039;ve said abouit us being typically human, more so you than me I daresay, when you pick up a book, watch a movie etcetera, do you look at the good points? My pal, Nats, (I can&#039;t understand how we&#039;re still pals with her and all that criticizing) she tells me, &quot;Jo, I like the the part where the trackers come in, it&#039;s good.&quot; I say, &quot;Me too.&quot; She tells me, &quot;It&#039;s too repititive for my taste, but it&#039;s all personal preferences, it&#039;s not a bad book.&quot; I agree. There&#039;s no good or bad book. It&#039;s whether you like it or not. And the strangest thing is that when we focus on the good points of all our books, we find more books enjoyable than others do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez.. So what if the movie doesn&#8217;t meet its mark. It&#8217;s Twilight, and that&#8217;s what counts. Or would you prefer a Twilight with night-vision goggles? Everyone who has made that particular statement is sooo typically human; all we do is criticize. Do we give the cast what their worth? No, we don&#8217;t. Do we give them the respect they deserve for all the effort put into it? No we don&#8217;t. Do we watch the movie and say: &#8220;Gee, that stunt must be pretty hard on them&#8221; or &#8220;Look at how Kristen nails that &#8216;tortured expression&#8217; perfectly, it must have been hell of an effort from her&#8221;? No we don&#8217;t. No matter how &#8216;vampire-y&#8217; we want them to be, no matter how &#8216;werewolf-y&#8217; or &#8216;Bella-y&#8217; we expect them to be, they&#8217;re still humans to the bones, you can&#8217;t have something literally out of the storybook. So cut the whole cast some slack, scriptwriter, editor and all, and give them the credit they deserve. </p>
<p>Oh, and this goes out to Chii, you&#8217;ve asked for someone oh so well-versed with the series to enlighten you, I&#8217;ve read it 88 times, and I think I have it in me to shed some light on the topic. I assume from your long, dedicated post to the &#8216;horrors&#8217; of dearly, beloved Twilight, that you for one, are a pessimist, and you thoroughly do NOT believe in true love. Point one, it&#8217;s a fantasy, here, we&#8217;re allowed to dream, we&#8217;re allowed to imagine soulmates exist for our favourite Bella and the rest of us. Sure, a pessimist like you would think it&#8217;s a whole load of crap, but keep that to yourself and don&#8217;t ruin it for the rest of us. Who knows? One day, when you&#8217;ve found that &#8216;perfect someone&#8217;, you&#8217;d think back to this very day and say:&#8221;What was I thinking?&#8221; Agreed? </p>
<p>Seriously, it&#8217;d be no surprise if you turn out to be my friend, Nats. She has uncannily the exact ideals as you do. Quote:&#8217;I don&#8217;t see why Stephenie Meyer has to describe Bella eating her cereal one by one.&#8217; And to that, I told her, &#8216;Put a sock in it.&#8217; Oh, and I suppose you WOULDN&#8217;T like it if someone listens to you? Puh-leez. I listen to my friends rant all the day, they call me and we&#8217;re on the phone for hours, with me offering opinion when needed and basically there to lend a ear, what&#8217;s wrong with that? Or are you telling me I&#8217;M a fictional character? If I&#8217;m out of a book, how is it that I&#8217;m typing this reply this very second? You tell me. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read my fill of historical romance, aand believe me, Edward is every bit a olden era hero, unlike the chauvanists we have here in the real world and in certain other books, of which I feel too tempted to rip, Edward lets Bella have her way at times, he treats her with utmost respect, he does NOT expect her to wait on him hand and foot. So it&#8217;s YOUR turn to enlighten me, how is it, with all these traits is Edward a chauvanist? I&#8217;m waiting to see the light. Back to what I&#8217;ve said abouit us being typically human, more so you than me I daresay, when you pick up a book, watch a movie etcetera, do you look at the good points? My pal, Nats, (I can&#8217;t understand how we&#8217;re still pals with her and all that criticizing) she tells me, &#8220;Jo, I like the the part where the trackers come in, it&#8217;s good.&#8221; I say, &#8220;Me too.&#8221; She tells me, &#8220;It&#8217;s too repititive for my taste, but it&#8217;s all personal preferences, it&#8217;s not a bad book.&#8221; I agree. There&#8217;s no good or bad book. It&#8217;s whether you like it or not. And the strangest thing is that when we focus on the good points of all our books, we find more books enjoyable than others do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chii</title>
		<link>http://twilightsingapore.com/2008/12/12/cna-primetime-morning-zoom-in-reviews-on-twilight/#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>Chii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilightsingapore.com/?p=2518#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>Oh, I haven&#039;t mentioned anything about the movie. Haven&#039;t watched it, but we all know movies will never match up to the book it&#039;s adapted from. So if you&#039;re disappointed with it, blame the people who wrote the script adaptation. Perhaps Melanie thought they were mediocre too, considering her review of the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I haven&#8217;t mentioned anything about the movie. Haven&#8217;t watched it, but we all know movies will never match up to the book it&#8217;s adapted from. So if you&#8217;re disappointed with it, blame the people who wrote the script adaptation. Perhaps Melanie thought they were mediocre too, considering her review of the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chii</title>
		<link>http://twilightsingapore.com/2008/12/12/cna-primetime-morning-zoom-in-reviews-on-twilight/#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>Chii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilightsingapore.com/?p=2518#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>Twilight is the disappointment of the literature world. Yes, it&#039;s a romance story. No, the romance didn&#039;t get developed past the &#039;He sparkles! ZOMG I&#039;m suddenly attracted to him!&#039; and &#039;She smells good but it&#039;s forbidden NO...&#039; Sorry, I don&#039;t quite see *how* they fell in love with each other. Or perhaps someone who&#039;s ever so well-versed in the series can enlighten me on this. Language-wise, I&#039;ve read fanfictions that are so well-written they are on par with mainstream writers. There are only so many ways I can read that they&#039;re prettypaleglitteryabsorbinglybreathtaking, and it&#039;s redundant how detailed it is when Bella prepares meals. Character-wise, Edward in the book is just plain chauvinist and Bella isn&#039;t a strong character - and the balance of power between them is just too skewed, even if it may seem as if at times, Edward can&#039;t help but listen to her. As a romance story, it just doesn&#039;t cut it. It&#039;s sad to see little girls thinking that this is what True Love is: being dependent on a guy and surrendering all power to said person. Still, everyone has their own preference. Cheers.

Oh, and don&#039;t trust Ms Oliveiro. She gives good films 3 to 2 popcorns and those that are a waste of time, more often than not, 4 popcorns. She waxes poetry about films and rates them 3 popcorns. Not a film goes by where she does not mock at least 3 aspects of it. I tune out when she appears on CNA. I suggest you do the same, and judge films yourselves because we all have our own preferences when it comes to arts and entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twilight is the disappointment of the literature world. Yes, it&#8217;s a romance story. No, the romance didn&#8217;t get developed past the &#8216;He sparkles! ZOMG I&#8217;m suddenly attracted to him!&#8217; and &#8216;She smells good but it&#8217;s forbidden NO&#8230;&#8217; Sorry, I don&#8217;t quite see *how* they fell in love with each other. Or perhaps someone who&#8217;s ever so well-versed in the series can enlighten me on this. Language-wise, I&#8217;ve read fanfictions that are so well-written they are on par with mainstream writers. There are only so many ways I can read that they&#8217;re prettypaleglitteryabsorbinglybreathtaking, and it&#8217;s redundant how detailed it is when Bella prepares meals. Character-wise, Edward in the book is just plain chauvinist and Bella isn&#8217;t a strong character &#8211; and the balance of power between them is just too skewed, even if it may seem as if at times, Edward can&#8217;t help but listen to her. As a romance story, it just doesn&#8217;t cut it. It&#8217;s sad to see little girls thinking that this is what True Love is: being dependent on a guy and surrendering all power to said person. Still, everyone has their own preference. Cheers.</p>
<p>Oh, and don&#8217;t trust Ms Oliveiro. She gives good films 3 to 2 popcorns and those that are a waste of time, more often than not, 4 popcorns. She waxes poetry about films and rates them 3 popcorns. Not a film goes by where she does not mock at least 3 aspects of it. I tune out when she appears on CNA. I suggest you do the same, and judge films yourselves because we all have our own preferences when it comes to arts and entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cas</title>
		<link>http://twilightsingapore.com/2008/12/12/cna-primetime-morning-zoom-in-reviews-on-twilight/#comment-1595</link>
		<dc:creator>Cas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilightsingapore.com/?p=2518#comment-1595</guid>
		<description>UGH! i watched the movie review thing twice and it still pisses me off till today! She practically disses all the movies and &quot;solving a difficult maths problem&quot;? what is HER problem? I agree with you Celia its more of romance than thriller and that was the point of us going crazy over the movie and books</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UGH! i watched the movie review thing twice and it still pisses me off till today! She practically disses all the movies and &#8220;solving a difficult maths problem&#8221;? what is HER problem? I agree with you Celia its more of romance than thriller and that was the point of us going crazy over the movie and books</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: readingtwilight</title>
		<link>http://twilightsingapore.com/2008/12/12/cna-primetime-morning-zoom-in-reviews-on-twilight/#comment-1572</link>
		<dc:creator>readingtwilight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilightsingapore.com/?p=2518#comment-1572</guid>
		<description>I kinda agree with what Shan has said.It would be hard for a Twilighter to be unbiased. They/we would already have preconceived notions about the franchise. Love is blind after all.

All this talk about how Melanie should have read the book before watching the movie...well the thing is she is reviewing the movie as a movie. If it is a good movie or not...in general.If it can stand on its own. Not if it was a good adaptation. Because even if a chunk of its box-office takings are from the Twilighters...it still has to somewhat appeal to the rest of the masses who are not thoroughly familiar with Twilight. Like what Shan said &quot;The movie should be enjoyable to people who have never read the book&quot;.

And I don&#039;t think Melanie is harsh reviewer at all. I thought she was pretty fair (Frankly I don&#039;t think the movie will fair well among movie reviewers). She did say &quot;for most devoted fans of the Twilight series, this film will not dissapoint&quot; - which is true. But she also said &quot; But for the majority of us who will evaluate it as a gothic vampire romance tale  - it’s not so hot and if i may it lacks BITE!&quot; - which you have to admit could be the likely the case. 3 popcorns too is quite respectable. She might not like it that much...but it kinda says...there are others who might like...so it deserves a watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda agree with what Shan has said.It would be hard for a Twilighter to be unbiased. They/we would already have preconceived notions about the franchise. Love is blind after all.</p>
<p>All this talk about how Melanie should have read the book before watching the movie&#8230;well the thing is she is reviewing the movie as a movie. If it is a good movie or not&#8230;in general.If it can stand on its own. Not if it was a good adaptation. Because even if a chunk of its box-office takings are from the Twilighters&#8230;it still has to somewhat appeal to the rest of the masses who are not thoroughly familiar with Twilight. Like what Shan said &#8220;The movie should be enjoyable to people who have never read the book&#8221;.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t think Melanie is harsh reviewer at all. I thought she was pretty fair (Frankly I don&#8217;t think the movie will fair well among movie reviewers). She did say &#8220;for most devoted fans of the Twilight series, this film will not dissapoint&#8221; &#8211; which is true. But she also said &#8221; But for the majority of us who will evaluate it as a gothic vampire romance tale  &#8211; it’s not so hot and if i may it lacks BITE!&#8221; &#8211; which you have to admit could be the likely the case. 3 popcorns too is quite respectable. She might not like it that much&#8230;but it kinda says&#8230;there are others who might like&#8230;so it deserves a watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shan</title>
		<link>http://twilightsingapore.com/2008/12/12/cna-primetime-morning-zoom-in-reviews-on-twilight/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>Shan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twilightsingapore.com/?p=2518#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>A Twilighter wouldn&#039;t be unbiased, they&#039;ve already formed an opinion about the franchise, and so they are biased. Someone who has no prior exposure to the books like Melanie Oliveiro is an unbiased reviewer. The movie should be enjoyable to people who have never read the book, if it&#039;s not then it&#039;s a bad movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Twilighter wouldn&#8217;t be unbiased, they&#8217;ve already formed an opinion about the franchise, and so they are biased. Someone who has no prior exposure to the books like Melanie Oliveiro is an unbiased reviewer. The movie should be enjoyable to people who have never read the book, if it&#8217;s not then it&#8217;s a bad movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
